Pages
Posts
- Detection
- “Top Five” Due Diligence Background Checks
- Address, map and satellite photo sites
- Address, map and satellite photo sites
- Automated Tests for Collusive Bidding and the Data Required to Conduct Them
- Collusive Bidding Schemes
- Compliance sites
- Compliance sites
- Confidential Reporting Systems (“Hotlines”)
- Corporate registries and business directories
- Data Required to Conduct Proactive Tests
- Debarment and suspension lists
- Debarment lists
- Due Diligence Background Checks on Firms and Individuals
- Due Diligence Service Providers
- Examples of Common “Proactive” Fraud Detection Tests
- Free and Subscription Internet Sites
- General information sites
- General initial interview questions
- General news and information sites on the internet
- How to Generate Complaints and Reports
- How to Respond to a Complaint
- Information about a Website: Qwnership, IP Address, Location, etc.
- Information on agents
- Information on Companies
- Initial Interview Questions By Scheme
- Internet Research
- Interview Questions: Bribes and Kickbacks
- Interview Questions: False Statements and Claims
- Interview Questions: Fictitious Contractor
- Interview Questions: Hidden Interests
- Interview Questions: Split Purchases
- Interview Questions: Change Order Abuse
- Interview Questions: Collusive Bidding by Contractors
- Interview Questions: Excluding Qualified Bidders
- Interview Questions: Failure to Meet Contract Specifications
- Interview Questions: False, Inflated or Duplicate Invoices
- Interview Questions: Leaking of Bid Information
- Interview Questions: Product Substitution
- Interview Questions: Rigged Specifications
- Interview Questions: Unbalanced Bidding
- Interview Questions: Unjustified Sole Source Awards
- Is The Complainant Credible?
- List of fraud reporting sites for Multilateral Development Banks
- Local and On-Site Due Diligence Checks
- Manipulation of Bids Interview Questions
- Media reports
- Media reports
- Other useful websites
- Proactive Fraud Detection Tests
- Red Flag: Unusual Bidding Patterns
- Red Flag: Acceptance of Poor Quality Goods, Works or Services
- Red Flag: Award to Other Than Lowest Qualified Bidder
- Red Flag: Bidder Not Listed in Directories or on Internet
- Red Flag: Complaints from Losing and Excluded Bidders
- Red Flag: Complaints Regarding Goods, Works or Services
- Red Flag: Contract Specifications Are Too Narrow or Too Broad
- Red Flag: Delivery of Poor Quality Goods, Works or Services
- Red Flag: Failure to Make Bidding Documents Available
- Red Flag: Inappropriate Evaluation Criteria or Procedures
- Red Flag: Incomplete, Questionable Payment Documentation
- Red Flag: Long Delays in Contract Negotiations or Award
- Red Flag: Manipulation of Procurement Thresholds
- Red Flag: Multiple Awards Just Under Procurement Thresholds
- Red Flag: Non-Transparent Bid Opening Procedures
- Red Flag: Payment of Unjustified High Prices
- Red Flag: Poorly Supported Disqualifications
- Red Flag: Pressure to Select a Certain Contractor or Subcontractor
- Red Flag: Purchase of Unnecessary or Inappropriate Items
- Red Flag: Qualified Companies Fail to Bid
- Red Flag: Questionable Agents, Consultants or Subcontractors
- Red Flag: Questionable Contract Amendments (Change Orders)
- Red Flag: Questionable Invoices
- Red Flag: Rotation of Winning Bidders
- Red Flag: Short or Inadequate Notice to Bidders
- Red Flag: Similarity in Bids; Apparent Connections Between Bidders
- Red Flag: Too Many Contract Awards to the Same Company
- Red Flag: Unreasonable Prequalification Requirements
- Red Flag: Unreasonably High Line Item Bids
- Red Flag: Unreasonably Low Line Item Bids
- Red Flag: Vague, Ambiguous or Incomplete Specifications
- Red Flag: Winning Bid Very Close to Budget or Cost Estimates
- Red Flags Bid Manipulation
- Red Flags Listed by Project Cycle
- Red Flags of Bribes and Kickbacks
- Red Flags of Change Order Abuse
- Red Flags of Corruption, Bid Rigging, Collusive Bidding and Fraud
- Red Flags of Excluding Qualified Bidders
- Red Flags of Hidden Interests
- Red Flags of Leaking Bid Information
- Red Flags of Rigged Specifications
- US and international court records
- US and international court records
- US and international public records
- US and international public records
- US and international telephone directories
- US and international telephone directories
- US Embassy Commercial Service International Company Profile
- Verify educational credentials
- Verifying educational credentials
- Due Diligence Background Checks
- “Top Five” Due Diligence Background Checks
- Address, map and satellite photo sites
- Address, map and satellite photo sites
- Collusive Bidding Schemes
- Compliance sites
- Compliance sites
- Corporate registries and business directories
- Debarment and suspension lists
- Debarment lists
- Due Diligence Background Checks on Firms and Individuals
- Due Diligence Service Providers
- Free and Subscription Internet Sites
- General information sites
- General news and information sites on the internet
- Information about a Website: Qwnership, IP Address, Location, etc.
- Information on agents
- Information on Companies
- Internet Research
- Local and On-Site Due Diligence Checks
- Media reports
- Media reports
- Other useful websites
- US and international court records
- US and international court records
- US and international public records
- US and international public records
- US and international telephone directories
- US and international telephone directories
- US Embassy Commercial Service International Company Profile
- Verify educational credentials
- Verifying educational credentials
- How To Respond To A Complaint
- Collusive Bidding Schemes
- Confidential Reporting Systems (“Hotlines”)
- General initial interview questions
- How to Generate Complaints and Reports
- How to Respond to a Complaint
- Initial Interview Questions By Scheme
- Interview Questions: Bribes and Kickbacks
- Interview Questions: False Statements and Claims
- Interview Questions: Fictitious Contractor
- Interview Questions: Hidden Interests
- Interview Questions: Split Purchases
- Interview Questions: Change Order Abuse
- Interview Questions: Collusive Bidding by Contractors
- Interview Questions: Excluding Qualified Bidders
- Interview Questions: Failure to Meet Contract Specifications
- Interview Questions: False, Inflated or Duplicate Invoices
- Interview Questions: Leaking of Bid Information
- Interview Questions: Product Substitution
- Interview Questions: Rigged Specifications
- Interview Questions: Unbalanced Bidding
- Interview Questions: Unjustified Sole Source Awards
- Is The Complainant Credible?
- List of fraud reporting sites for Multilateral Development Banks
- Manipulation of Bids Interview Questions
- Prevention
- Proof
- Bid Rigging Schemes
- Case Example of Change Order Abuse
- Case Example of Collusive Bidding by Contractors
- Case Example of Excluding Qualified Bidders
- Case Example of Failure to Meet Contract Specifications
- Case Example of False Statements and Claims
- Case Example of False, Inflated and Duplicate Invoices
- Case Example of Fictitious Contractor
- Case Example of Leaking Bid Information
- Case Example of Manipulation of Bids
- Case Example of Product Substitution
- Case Example of Rigged Specifications
- Case Example of Split Purchases
- Case Example of Unbalanced Bidding
- Case Example of Unjustified Sole Source Awards
- Case Examples of Bribes and Kickbacks
- Case Examples of Collusive Bidding by Contractors
- Case Examples of Hidden Interests
- Collusive Bidding Schemes
- Corruption Schemes
- Elements of Proof for Sanctionable Offenses
- Elements of Proof of Coercive Practices
- Elements of Proof of Collusive Practices
- Elements of Proof of Corrupt Practices
- Elements of Proof of Fraudulent Practices
- Elements of Proof of Obstructive Practices
- Financial Investigation of the Subject
- Fraud Schemes
- Potential Scheme: Bribes and Kickbacks
- Potential Scheme: False Statements and Claims
- Potential Scheme: False, Inflated and Duplicate Invoices
- Potential Scheme: Fictitious Contractor (Phantom Vendor)
- Potential Scheme: Leaking of Bid Information
- Potential Scheme: Split Purchases
- Potential Scheme: Change Order Abuse
- Potential Scheme: Excluding Qualified Bidders
- Potential Scheme: Failure to Meet Contract Specifications
- Potential Scheme: Manipulation of Bids
- Potential Scheme: Product Substitution
- Potential Scheme: Rigged Specifications
- Potential Scheme: Unbalanced Bidding
- Potential Scheme: Unjustified Sole Source Awards
- Potential Schemes: Hidden Interests (Conflicts of Interest)
- Step Eight: Obtain the Cooperation of an Inside Witness
- Step Five: Check for Predication and Get Organized
- Step Four: Complete the Internal Investigation
- Step Nine: Interview the Primary Subject
- Step One: Begin The Case
- Step Seven: Prove Illicit Payments
- Step Six: Begin the External Investigation
- Step Ten: Prepare the Final Report
- Step Three: Due Diligence Background Checks
- Step Two: Evaluate the Allegations or Suspicions
- The Basics of Evidence for Fraud and Corruption Investigators
- The Basics of Evidence for Fraud and Corruption Investigators
- The Most Common Schemes and Steps of Proof
- Red Flags of Corruption, Bid Rigging and Other Schemes
- Automated Tests for Collusive Bidding and the Data Required to Conduct Them
- Collusive Bidding Schemes
- Data Required to Conduct Proactive Tests
- Examples of Common “Proactive” Fraud Detection Tests
- Proactive Fraud Detection Tests
- Red Flag: Unusual Bidding Patterns
- Red Flag: Acceptance of Poor Quality Goods, Works or Services
- Red Flag: Award to Other Than Lowest Qualified Bidder
- Red Flag: Bidder Not Listed in Directories or on Internet
- Red Flag: Complaints from Losing and Excluded Bidders
- Red Flag: Complaints Regarding Goods, Works or Services
- Red Flag: Contract Specifications Are Too Narrow or Too Broad
- Red Flag: Delivery of Poor Quality Goods, Works or Services
- Red Flag: Failure to Make Bidding Documents Available
- Red Flag: Inappropriate Evaluation Criteria or Procedures
- Red Flag: Incomplete, Questionable Payment Documentation
- Red Flag: Long Delays in Contract Negotiations or Award
- Red Flag: Manipulation of Procurement Thresholds
- Red Flag: Multiple Awards Just Under Procurement Thresholds
- Red Flag: Non-Transparent Bid Opening Procedures
- Red Flag: Payment of Unjustified High Prices
- Red Flag: Poorly Supported Disqualifications
- Red Flag: Pressure to Select a Certain Contractor or Subcontractor
- Red Flag: Purchase of Unnecessary or Inappropriate Items
- Red Flag: Qualified Companies Fail to Bid
- Red Flag: Questionable Agents, Consultants or Subcontractors
- Red Flag: Questionable Contract Amendments (Change Orders)
- Red Flag: Questionable Invoices
- Red Flag: Rotation of Winning Bidders
- Red Flag: Short or Inadequate Notice to Bidders
- Red Flag: Similarity in Bids; Apparent Connections Between Bidders
- Red Flag: Too Many Contract Awards to the Same Company
- Red Flag: Unreasonable Prequalification Requirements
- Red Flag: Unreasonably High Line Item Bids
- Red Flag: Unreasonably Low Line Item Bids
- Red Flag: Vague, Ambiguous or Incomplete Specifications
- Red Flag: Winning Bid Very Close to Budget or Cost Estimates
- Red Flags Bid Manipulation
- Red Flags Listed by Project Cycle
- Red Flags of Bribes and Kickbacks
- Red Flags of Change Order Abuse
- Red Flags of Corruption, Bid Rigging, Collusive Bidding and Fraud
- Red Flags of Excluding Qualified Bidders
- Red Flags of Hidden Interests
- Red Flags of Leaking Bid Information
- Red Flags of Rigged Specifications
- The Elements of Proof for Sanctionable Offenses
- Collusive Bidding Schemes
- Elements of Proof of Coercive Practices
- Elements of Proof of Collusive Practices
- Elements of Proof of Corrupt Practices
- Elements of Proof of Fraudulent Practices
- Elements of Proof of Obstructive Practices
- The Basics of Evidence for Fraud and Corruption Investigators
- The Basics of Evidence for Fraud and Corruption Investigators
- The Most Common Schemes and Steps of Proof
- Bid Rigging Schemes
- Case Example of Change Order Abuse
- Case Example of Collusive Bidding by Contractors
- Case Example of Excluding Qualified Bidders
- Case Example of Failure to Meet Contract Specifications
- Case Example of False Statements and Claims
- Case Example of False, Inflated and Duplicate Invoices
- Case Example of Fictitious Contractor
- Case Example of Leaking Bid Information
- Case Example of Manipulation of Bids
- Case Example of Product Substitution
- Case Example of Rigged Specifications
- Case Example of Split Purchases
- Case Example of Unbalanced Bidding
- Case Example of Unjustified Sole Source Awards
- Case Examples of Bribes and Kickbacks
- Case Examples of Collusive Bidding by Contractors
- Case Examples of Hidden Interests
- Collusive Bidding Schemes
- Corruption Schemes
- Financial Investigation of the Subject
- Fraud Schemes
- Potential Scheme: Bribes and Kickbacks
- Potential Scheme: False Statements and Claims
- Potential Scheme: False, Inflated and Duplicate Invoices
- Potential Scheme: Fictitious Contractor (Phantom Vendor)
- Potential Scheme: Leaking of Bid Information
- Potential Scheme: Split Purchases
- Potential Scheme: Change Order Abuse
- Potential Scheme: Excluding Qualified Bidders
- Potential Scheme: Failure to Meet Contract Specifications
- Potential Scheme: Manipulation of Bids
- Potential Scheme: Product Substitution
- Potential Scheme: Rigged Specifications
- Potential Scheme: Unbalanced Bidding
- Potential Scheme: Unjustified Sole Source Awards
- Potential Schemes: Hidden Interests (Conflicts of Interest)
- Step Five: Check for Predication and Get Organized
- Step Four: Complete the Internal Investigation
- Step Nine: Interview the Primary Subject
- Step One: Begin The Case
- Step Seven: Prove Illicit Payments
- Step Six: Begin the External Investigation
- Step Three: Due Diligence Background Checks
- Step Two: Evaluate the Allegations or Suspicions
- Uncategorized
- Collusive Bidding Schemes
- How to Interview a Cooperative Witness
- How to Prove Illicit Payments from the Point of Payment
- How to Prove Illicit Payments from the Point of Receipt
- How to Prove Illicit Payments in Cash
- Information on people
- International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)
- Secrecy Jurisdictions
- Social media sites
- The Very Basic Basics of Money Laundering
Archives
- June 2017 (2)
- July 2015 (4)
- January 2013 (2)
- May 2012 (1)
- April 2012 (1)
- March 2012 (21)
- September 2011 (12)
- August 2011 (27)
- July 2011 (19)
- June 2011 (74)
Categories
Sitemap created with WP Realtime Sitemap.