• Skip to main content
  • Skip to after header navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Guide to Combating Corruption & Fraud in Infrastructure Development Projects

  • Detection
    • Complaints
      • General initial interview questions
      • How to Generate Complaints and Reports
      • List of fraud reporting sites for Multilateral Development Banks
    • Red Flags
      • Red Flags Listed by Project Cycle
      • “Visible red flags” of Implementation Fraud
      • Proactive Fraud Detection Tests
    • Due Diligence
      • “Top Five” Due Diligence Background Checks
      • Free and Subscription Internet Sites
      • Local and On-Site Due Diligence Checks
      • Due Diligence Service Providers
  • Proof
    • Proving Common Schemes
      • Corruption Schemes
      • Bid Rigging Schemes
      • Collusive Bidding Schemes
      • Fraud Schemes
      • The Basic Steps of a Complex Fraud and Corruption Investigation
    • Elements of Proof for Sanctionable Offenses
      • Elements of Proof of Corrupt Practices
      • Elements of Proof of Obstructive Practices
      • Elements of Proof of Coercive Practices
      • Elements of Proof of Collusive Practices
      • Elements of Proof of Fraudulent Practices
  • Evidence
    • The Basics of Evidence for Investigators
  • Prevention
    • Anti-fraud Resources
Home » Proof » Case Examples » Case Example of Fictitious Contractor

Case Example of Fictitious Contractor

Feasibility Study

An employee of an international donor submitted an application to engage a consultant to prepare a feasibility study for a proposed project to import natural gas from a neighboring country.  The study was approved at an estimated cost of almost $500,000.

The employee conducted a sham “competition” for the study and selected a supposed small local firm as the most qualified.  The “firm” was a shell company set up by the donor employee under a fictitious name.  The employee prepared the feasibility study from materials already in his possession and information clipped from the internet, for which he was paid the full contract amount.  The scheme was discovered when the employee’s manager unexpectedly asked to review the report (which was not typically the case), discovered its very poor cut and paste quality and referred the matter to investigators.

Category: Case Examples

International Anti-Corruption
Resource Center

Washington, DC
info@iacrc.org

IACRC - International Anti-Corruption Resource Center

© 2025 · IACRC · Guide to Combating Corruption & Fraud in Infrastructure Development Projects · All Rights Reserved