• Skip to main content
  • Skip to after header navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Guide to Combating Corruption & Fraud in Infrastructure Development Projects

  • Detection
    • Complaints
      • General initial interview questions
      • How to Generate Complaints and Reports
      • List of fraud reporting sites for Multilateral Development Banks
    • Red Flags
      • Red Flags Listed by Project Cycle
      • “Visible red flags” of Implementation Fraud
      • Proactive Fraud Detection Tests
    • Due Diligence
      • “Top Five” Due Diligence Background Checks
      • Free and Subscription Internet Sites
      • Local and On-Site Due Diligence Checks
      • Due Diligence Service Providers
  • Proof
    • Proving Common Schemes
      • Corruption Schemes
      • Bid Rigging Schemes
      • Collusive Bidding Schemes
      • Fraud Schemes
      • The Basic Steps of a Complex Fraud and Corruption Investigation
    • Elements of Proof for Sanctionable Offenses
      • Elements of Proof of Corrupt Practices
      • Elements of Proof of Obstructive Practices
      • Elements of Proof of Coercive Practices
      • Elements of Proof of Collusive Practices
      • Elements of Proof of Fraudulent Practices
  • Evidence
    • The Basics of Evidence for Investigators
  • Prevention
    • Anti-fraud Resources
Home » Detection » Red Flags of Corruption, Bid Rigging and Other Schemes » Red Flag: Incomplete, Questionable Payment Documentation

Red Flag: Incomplete, Questionable Payment Documentation

The lack of  complete or appropriate supporting documentation is a potential indicator of many different schemes, but most directly of false, inflated or duplicate invoices and the failure to meet contract specifications.  Be alert for:

  • Unexplained or excessive delays in producing supporting documents that should be readily available;
  • Discrepancies in the documentation, for example, between the amounts claimed  for payment and the amounts in the supporting documents, or between documents submitted by the contractor and independent test or inspection results;
  • The submission of copies when originals are required or more appropriate;
  • Indications of changes to documents, such as backdating, erasures, white outs or apparently forged signatures;
  • Incomplete documentation, for example, invoices with only a post office or mail drop address;
  • Unusual or inappropriate documents, e.g., unnumbered or handwritten invoices, or invoices that are clean and unfolded, indicating that they might not have been mailed and were submitted directly by an employee.

This red flag can indicate the following schemes:

  • False, inflated or duplicate invoices
  • Failure to meet contract specifications
  • Product substitution
  • False statements and claims

Click on the schemes listed above to see more information on each scheme, a more complete listing of their red flags and steps to determine if the schemes are actually present.

Category: Red Flags of Corruption, Bid Rigging and Other Schemes

International Anti-Corruption
Resource Center

Washington, DC
info@iacrc.org

IACRC - International Anti-Corruption Resource Center

© 2025 · IACRC · Guide to Combating Corruption & Fraud in Infrastructure Development Projects · All Rights Reserved