• Skip to main content
  • Skip to after header navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Guide to Combating Corruption & Fraud in Infrastructure Development Projects

  • Detection
    • Complaints
      • General initial interview questions
      • How to Generate Complaints and Reports
      • List of fraud reporting sites for Multilateral Development Banks
    • Red Flags
      • Red Flags Listed by Project Cycle
      • “Visible red flags” of Implementation Fraud
      • Proactive Fraud Detection Tests
    • Due Diligence
      • “Top Five” Due Diligence Background Checks
      • Free and Subscription Internet Sites
      • Local and On-Site Due Diligence Checks
      • Due Diligence Service Providers
  • Proof
    • Proving Common Schemes
      • Corruption Schemes
      • Bid Rigging Schemes
      • Collusive Bidding Schemes
      • Fraud Schemes
      • The Basic Steps of a Complex Fraud and Corruption Investigation
    • Elements of Proof for Sanctionable Offenses
      • Elements of Proof of Corrupt Practices
      • Elements of Proof of Obstructive Practices
      • Elements of Proof of Coercive Practices
      • Elements of Proof of Collusive Practices
      • Elements of Proof of Fraudulent Practices
  • Evidence
    • The Basics of Evidence for Investigators
  • Prevention
    • Anti-fraud Resources
Home » Detection » Red Flags of Corruption, Bid Rigging and Other Schemes » Red Flag: Inappropriate Evaluation Criteria or Procedures

Red Flag: Inappropriate Evaluation Criteria or Procedures

Inappropriate bid evaluation criteria or procedures that can facilitate the schemes listed below include:

  • Changing the evaluation criteria during the evaluation process;
  • Evaluation criteria that are too vague or subjective, e.g., imprecise criteria for scoring the qualifications of proposed consulting staff, allowing for manipulation of the scores;
  • Criteria that is weighted too heavily on one technical component over another, or on technical scores rather than price, or vice versa;
  • Failing to notify bidders of the evaluation criteria;
  • Failing to notify the losing bidders of the reasons for their loss;
  • Allowing unqualified or inappropriate personnel (e.g., government officials) to participate in bid evaluations;
  • Using a standing bid evaluation committee with the same committee members over an extended time period.

This red flag can indicate the following schemes:

  • Excluding qualified bidders
  • Manipulation of bids
  • Corruption

Click on the schemes listed above to see more information on each scheme, a more complete listing of their red flags and steps to determine if the schemes  are actually present.

Category: Red Flags of Corruption, Bid Rigging and Other Schemes

International Anti-Corruption
Resource Center

Washington, DC
info@iacrc.org

IACRC - International Anti-Corruption Resource Center

© 2025 · IACRC · Guide to Combating Corruption & Fraud in Infrastructure Development Projects · All Rights Reserved